Women and their Families Deserve Justice . #UpholdRHLaw

This is a press release from Likhaan.

Fourteen to fifteen Filipino women die every day from pregnancy and childbirth. Sixty three percent of all married women don’t want to get pregnant anymore; of those with three children, the rate goes way up to eighty one percent. We have the highest teen birth rate among ten ASEAN countries—five percent annually.

These problems are well-documented*. They hit hardest the most vulnerable: women, the poor, the young. More than a decade of open and vigorous debates led to RA 10354, the Reproductive Health or RH law that mandates actions and solutions. Yet now we’re back to the debating arena. How many lives must be lost or ruined before we stop talking and start working?

Those who lost in the public, scientific and legislative debates are now in the Supreme Court raising the same false charges against RH. Moreover, they are asking that the law be indefinitely suspended—in effect, that the status quo of deaths and misery be maintained—while the nation listens again to their arguments in court. Their blend of arrogance and irresponsibility is frightening.

Anti-RH groups repeatedly claim that most contraceptives, specifically IUDs and hormonals, cause abortions and violate the 1987 Constitution which says that the State “shall equally protect the life of the mother and the life of the unborn from conception.” Yet for the last 26 years, these contraceptives have remained legal. Anti-RH groups have shied away from regulatory agencies to present and defend their evidence. It is easy to understand why: no reputable health or scientific body support their assertion. It is also easy to spot the absurdity of their claim: they believe that contraceptives can be weak enough to fail and allow a pregnancy and at the same time be strong enough to abort the same pregnancy. Then, after digging up all the theoretical mechanisms of IUDs and pills that somehow support their abortion claim, these same groups ignore the obviously non-abortive mechanism of condoms, tubal ligation and vasectomy, and simply oppose them on other grounds.

Religious beliefs best explain the actions and positions of anti-RH groups. They cannot use religious beliefs in court, so they simply renamed them as “natural law.” We hope the Supreme Court quickly sees through their ruse and prevent the establishment of a single article of faith over matters of sex, having children, contraception and family life.

We urge the Supreme Court to prevent further delays of the RH Law. We all know and accept the saying: Justice delayed is justice denied. Filipino women and their families, especially the poor, have suffered long enough. They too, deserve justice.

* The maternal mortality ratio is 221 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births (NSO, 2011 Family Health Survey), and there are 2.398 M live births annually (UN Population Division, Medium variant, 2010-2015) which means around 5,300 maternal deaths occur per year. Data on married women who do not want any more children are from the 2008 National Demographic and Health Survey of the NSO and ICF Macro. Data on teen (15-19) births in the Philippines and ASEAN countries are from the World Bank’s online database ( http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.ADO.TFRT ).

Noemi Lardizabal-Dado is a Content Strategist with over 13 years experience in blogging, content management, citizen advocacy and media literacy and over 23 years in web development. Otherwise known as @MomBlogger on social media, she believes in making a difference in the lives of her children by advocating social change for social good.

She is a co-founder and a member of the editorial board of Blog Watch . She is a resource speaker on media literacy, social media , blogging, digital citizenship, good governance, transparency, parenting, women’s rights and wellness, and cyber safety.

Her personal blogs such as aboutmyrecovery.com (parenting) , pinoyfoodblog.com (recipes), techiegadgets.com (gadgets) and beautyoverfifty.net (lifestyle), benguetarabica.coffee keep her busy outside of Blog Watch.


I am an advocate. I am NOT neutral. I will NOT give social media mileage to members of political clans, epal, a previous candidate for the same position and those I believe are a waste of taxpayers’ money.

I do not support or belong to any political party.

She was a Senior Consultant for ALL media engagements for the PCOO-led Committee on Media Affairs & Strategic Communications (CMASC) under the ASEAN 2017 National Organizing Council from January 4 -July 5, 2017. Having been an ASEAN advocate since 2011, she has written extensively about the benefits of the ASEAN community and as a region of opportunities on Blog Watch and aboutmyrecovery.com.

Organization affiliation includes Consortium on Democracy and Disinformation

Updated Juky 15, 2019

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Google+ YouTube 

(Visited 48 times, 1 visits today)
Thanks for rating this! Now tell the world how you feel - .
How does this post make you feel?
  • Excited
  • Fascinated
  • Amused
  • Bored
  • Sad
  • Angry