Skip to content

SC declares key provisions of DAP unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that the salient provisions under the Aquino government’s Disbursement Acceleration Program (DAP) are unconstitutional.

SC decision on DAP

Voting 13-0-1, the SC justices declared the following acts under the DAP as unconstitutional: withdrawal of unobligated allotments from the implementing agencies; cross-border transfers of savings of the executive department to offices outside the executive department; and funding of projects, activities, programs not covered by appropriations in the General Appropriations Act (GAA).

Justice Teresita de Castra inhibited from the voting while Justice Presbitero Velasco gave his vote to Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno as he was on official leave.

SC Spokesperson Theodore Te said the three acts violated Section 25 (5) Article VI of the 1987 Constitution and the doctrines of separation of powers.

The said constitutional provision states that “no law shall be passed authorizing any transfer of appropriations; however, the President, the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, and the heads of Constitutional Commissions may, by law, be authorized to augment any item in the general appropriations law for their respective offices from savings in other items of their respective appropriations.”

Te explained in a report that with the ruling, the SC also voids the use of unprogrammed funds despite the absence of a certification by the National Treasurer that the revenue collections exceeded the revenue targets or non-compliance with the conditions provided in the relevant GAA.

Under DAP, the Department of Budget Management with the President’s approval realigned “savings” or accumulated funds to augment existing programs and projects of other agencies, including those that are not under the executive branch.

Petitioners however have argued that DAP funds could not be “savings” since the projects or programs from which they were withdrawn have not been completed, or discontinued or abandoned.

Bagong Alyansang Makabayan (Bayan), one of the nine petitioners against DAP, welcomed the SC ruling.

“As petitioners, we are happy with the declaration of programs and issuances under DAP, including DBM Circular 541 as unconstitutional. It is a blow to presidential lump sum and discretionary spending or presidential pork under Aquino,” Bayan secretary-general Reato Reyes Jr. said in a report.

“The big challenge now is accountability. We will pursue this for sure. Aquino and Abad should be answerable to the people,” Reyes added.

Senator Miriam Defensor-Santiago lauded the high court for its decision on DAP.

“It’s basically a no-brainer. The DAP is illegal because it was not contained in the 2011 or 2012 budgets, and because the alleged savings were used to augment new budget items which was not previously authorized by Congress,” Santiago said in a statement.

Originally written by JC Maningat, originally posted at POC.


About BlogWatch

BlogWatch began in November 2009 as a group of independent-minded bloggers and social media users helping with voter education. It has since evolved into a group of citizen advocates who engage government and the private sector, online and offline, for social good.

BlogWatch does not solicit, ask for, demand or receive any financial or material remuneration for involvement in its activities, whether in cash or in kind. Read our editorial policy which includes disclosure, methodology and corrections policy.

Share your thoughts on BlogWatch


Got something to say? Share your perspectives on current issues and contribute to the conversation.  Just contact the editorial board.

Read our older posts

“Best Story:” Award for Data Journalism PH 2015

BlogWatch received the “Best Story” Award for the First Data Journalism PH 2015 from the Open Knowledge Foundation and Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism “Aid Monitoring: Citizens’ Initial Efforts in the Wake of Typhoon Yolanda” . Forbes Philippines also garnered the same award.

BlogWatch receives the “Best Story” Award for the First Data Journalism PH 2015 from the Open Knowledge Foundation and Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism  for their story on “Aid Monitoring: Citizens’ Initial Efforts in the Wake of Typhoon Yolanda” . Forbes Philippines also received the same award.

Send Us A Message