Skip to content

Sotto’s Sarcastic Remarks on CyberCrime Prevention Act

Amid the high clamor against RA10175, otherwise known as the Cyber Crime Prevention Law, the bill law takes effect today, Oct 3, as the Supreme Court failed to release a temporary restraining order as requested by the 7 petitions separately filed by different groups of lawyers, bloggers and netizens.

Earlier this morning, Senate Majority Floor Leader Vicente Sotto III went on rounds of radio interview, airing his comment about the law. Some of his sentiments are published here. Tito Sotto was known to insert the highly contested libel clause in the law.

I am highly irritated by the air of sarcasm that this senator shows on these interviews. He totally misses the point of the clamor itself, but instead of addressing these points of argument, he verbally pukes out his defense appearing as if he wants public personalities (including him) against online criticisms. He makes the law sounds like it is the Protection of Celebrities and Public Figures Law instead of a law protecting the rights of the people.

I submit that the issue of decriminalization of libel is highly debatable during these times. Freedom of speech is a double-edged sword and must be wielded very responsibly. Although, as a blogger, I would want to reserve and exercise my right to freely express myself; I would always make sure that my expression of this right is within the limits of being responsible. I understand that this may be the primary reasons of those who voted for this law, however, Sotto,  sounds  like he inserted this clause in order to protect himself personally. His sarcastic remarks work against him, digging his hole to unpopularity.

Personal convictions have no place within the halls of the legislative chambers. Each Member of the Congress acts as the representative of the people and should not air such arrogance as I feel is shown by Sotto. Arrogance may have a place within Senate but it should be backed up, at least, by intellect. This Senator has a history of derailing important and urgent bills and now, we witness how he can sneak out his personal interests in the expense of the general populace. We should be very wary of this person: Sotto should be watched.

PS. There are online petitions ongoing to Sanction Sotto for his plagiarism issue almost a month ago. Please do join our online petitions.
SanctionSotto by
1 Million Signatures in 30 Days to OUST Tito Sotto from the Philippine Senate by Matt Quiros

Further Reading: How the ‘Third House’ inserted questionable provisions on CyberCrimeLaw


About BlogWatch

BlogWatch began in November 2009 as a group of independent-minded bloggers and social media users helping with voter education. It has since evolved into a group of citizen advocates who engage government and the private sector, online and offline, for social good.

BlogWatch does not solicit, ask for, demand or receive any financial or material remuneration for involvement in its activities, whether in cash or in kind. Read our editorial policy which includes disclosure, methodology and corrections policy.

Share your thoughts on BlogWatch


Got something to say? Share your perspectives on current issues and contribute to the conversation.  Just contact the editorial board.

Read our older posts

“Best Story:” Award for Data Journalism PH 2015

BlogWatch received the “Best Story” Award for the First Data Journalism PH 2015 from the Open Knowledge Foundation and Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism “Aid Monitoring: Citizens’ Initial Efforts in the Wake of Typhoon Yolanda” . Forbes Philippines also garnered the same award.

BlogWatch receives the “Best Story” Award for the First Data Journalism PH 2015 from the Open Knowledge Foundation and Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism  for their story on “Aid Monitoring: Citizens’ Initial Efforts in the Wake of Typhoon Yolanda” . Forbes Philippines also received the same award.

Send Us A Message